![]() ![]() ![]() The design of the film is great, but as in design, the beauty is found in the details. Having sacrificed the novel's intellectual depth, the film version does a great disservice to the dedicated reader: we are given special effects that defy logic and re-focus the story unnaturally and unnecessarily there are included scenes of hyped-up action they are neither satisfying nor helpful with advancing the plot we lose some of the intricate details of character development there's an unnecessary inclusion of giant scary creatures that offer distracting (and bizarre) thrills and the mystery of what Ember is is destroyed in the first minute of narration. ![]() In fact, this book could be a metaphor for metaphors - there are things below the surface that exist whether we acknowledge them or not it is our job to find the tools to excavate the "deeper" level of what exists for others only on the surface. When works of literature work on multiple levels, the filmmakers should at least offer us more than one. Jeanne DuPrau's book is an amazing trove of metaphors (candles, the library, the seed, the Pipeworks, and the city itself). Books rarely translate better to film and this one suffers for many reasons. Thompson, an accomplished screenwriter, deserves more of the blame in their (and my) opinion. ![]() Having just taken 129 eighth-graders who read the book to see the premiere, everyone left the theater disappointed with what director Kil Kenan and screenwriter Caroline Thompson have given us with this translation from the page to the screen. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |